Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 11, 1988 <br />Por•nogr~aphy the fr•anchi se agr•eement i s vi ol ated. The agr~eement al so pr•ovi des that <br />On Cable TV if the Commission takes the Company to cour•t and is successful, the <br />(Cont.) Cable Company must pay the court fees. <br />Fahey felt that the por•nogr•aphy being shown on Cable TV was clear•ly a <br />breach of contr•act since the Cable Company agr•eed not to show obscene <br />mater•ial. The question is whether• or~ not the Commission can establish <br />that the movies ar~e obscene. <br />Fahey also noted the new State Law which goes into effect on June 1, <br />1988 which is identical to the obscenity standar•ds established by the <br />Supr~eme Cour•t. Fahey noted that these standar~ds will now apply to all <br />video stores within the City and suggested that a copy of this new <br />law be sent to both the Cable Company and all video stor•es within the <br />City. <br />Blesener~ agr•eed. However~, Blesener• felt that action on the matter• should <br />be tabled until the City receives a r•esponse fr~om the Cable Company. <br />Fahey stated that he would pr•epare an appropr•iate letter advising <br />video stor•es as well as the Cable Company of the new State law which <br />is effective June 1, 1988. <br />Spooner• Fahey r~epor•ted that the School Boar•d r•ecently met on the City's counter•- <br />Par~k offer~ for• the pur•chase of Spooner~ Park for• $470,000. The School Boar•d <br />Pur•chase is r•equesting two contingencies. The fir•st is that the City will waive <br />the appr•oximately $13,000 in assessments on the pr•oper•ty. Fahey did not <br />A~~nda feel it appr•opr•iate to waive these assessments noting that the City is <br />Addition paying fair~ mar•ket value for the pr~oper•ty and it is customary for seller~s <br />to pay assessments. <br />Blesener~ pointed out that the City is not waiving assessments on the <br />property being purchased in the Centerville Road area. <br />Collova agr•eed that the assessments should not be waived pointing out <br />that he feels the $470,000 pur~chase price is too high. <br />Mr•. Blesener• intr•oduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 88-5-186 - INSTRUCTING THE <br />CITY CLERK TO SEMD A LETTER TO THE SCHOOL <br />DISTRICT INFORMING THEM THAT THE CITY COUNCIL <br />IS OFFERING $470,000 FOR THE PURCHASE OF 21.7 <br />ACRES OF PROPERTY KNOWN AS SPOONER PARK AND <br />THE CITY WILL NOT ASSUME ANY ASSESSMENT COSTS <br />The for•egoing r~esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Collova. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener•, Collova, LaValle, Fahey, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declar•ed adopted. <br />This r•esolution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 189. <br />Page -18- <br />