My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-88 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
05-11-88 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:43:38 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:52:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />City Council <br />May 11, 1988 <br />Spooner~ Fahey r•epor•ted that the School Distr•ict also wants assur~ance that if <br />Par~k ( Cont. ) the Ci ty pur~chases the property i t wi 11 be used for• par•k pur•poses for <br />as long as they have a school located adjacent to it. The School <br />Distr•ict wants a restrictive covenant placed on the pr~oper•ty restr•icting <br />its use to par•k and r•ecr•eation pur~poses. <br />The City Attor•ney pointed out the difficulty the property owner of the <br />old Little Canada School building had in dealing with the School <br />Distr~ict on that site. Therefor•e, the Attor•ney did not feel the City <br />should put itself into a position of needing the consent of the School <br />Distr•ict on Spooner• Par~k. The Attor•ney stated that the convenant would <br />be a cloud on the title of the pr~oper~ty. <br />Fahey noted that the City is paying fair• mar•ket value for• the land <br />and if a developer~ pur•chased the pr•oper•ty at fair• mar~ket value, ther•e <br />would be no r•estr•ictions placed on the land. <br />Fahey suggested that the City give the School Distr•ict a letter~ of <br />intent stating that the pr~oper•ty would be used for~ par•k pur•poses. <br />Scalze pointed out that the City is pur•chasing the pr~oper~ty under• the <br />assumption of R-1 zoning r•ather than Public zoning. The City is paying <br />a pr•emium for• the land because of this and felt that ther~e should be <br />no r•estr~ictions placed on the pr~oper~ty. <br />Blesener agr•eed that r•estr~ictions lessen the value of the land. <br />Mr. Fahey intr•oduced the following r•esolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 88-5-187 - INSTRUCTING THE CITY <br />CLERK TO ADUISE THE SCHOOL DISTRICT THAT BASED <br />ON THE ADVICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY TO THE CONTRARY <br />AND GIVEN THE FACT THAT THE CITY IS PAYING WNAT IT <br />BELIEVES TO BE FAIR MARKET VALUE FOR SPOONER PARK, <br />IT DOES NOT AGREE TO A REVERSIO~IAGREEMENT AS PART <br />OF THE SPOO~IER PARK PURCHASE, BUT 41ILL SUBMIT TO <br />THE SCHOOL DISTRICT A LETTER OF INTENT AS TO TNE <br />CITY'S USE OF TNE PROPERTY FOR PARK PURPOSES AND <br />WILL WORK WITH THE SCNOOL DISTRICT IN THE FUTURE <br />IN THE EVENT OF ANY CNAPJGE IN THAT USE <br />The for~egoi ng r~esol uti on was duly seconded by Mr•. B1 esener~. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener•, Collova, LaValle, Scalze. <br />Nays (O1. <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />This r~esolution appear•s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 190. <br />The City Engineer• repor•ted that he will be meeting with Paul Bor•g <br />to show him the boundar~ies of the pr•oper~ty that the City is pr~oposing <br />to pur•chase. <br />Page -19- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.