06-08-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r~rNUrEs City Council June 8, 1988 goosalis Mr•. Fahey intr~oduced the following r~esolution and moved its adoption: CUP (Cont.) RESOLUTION N0. 88-6-231 - CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE BOOSALIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST The for~egoing r~esolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Blesener•. Ayes (5) Fahey, Blesener~, LaValle, Scalze, Collova. Nays (O). Resolution declar~ed adopted. This r•esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 19, Page 234. The City Cler•k suggested that if the Council is willing the concept of the pr•oposal be appr•oved at this time. In the meantime a PUD Agreement would be dr•awn up to cover• the various conditions of appr•oval. Scalze pointed out the necessity for• r•ezoning of back por•tion of the commer•cial pr•oper~ty on County Road C to R-1. Scalze stated that these r•ezonings would have to be par•t of the PUD Agr~eement since the City should handle the entir~e pr•oposal as a package. The City Clerk pointed out that a public hearing was never held to consider~ the r•ezoning of the commer~cial pr•operty on County Road C. Pr•evious r•ezoning hear•ings dealt with only the Rice Str•eet pr~oper•ty. Fahey pointed out that the County Road C r•ezonings would need to be r•eviewed by the Planning Commission. Fahey suggested that a public hear~ing be scheduled to consider the r~ezonings for• the fir•st meeting in July. The Planning Commission is meeting tomor~row evening and can consider• the pr~oposal at that time. Scalze noted that ther•e ar•e 4 commer~cial lots on County Road C and that the City does not want to get into the situation wher•e ther~e i s commer•ci al pr~oper~ty fr~onti ng on a r•esi denti al str~eet. Thus, ther•e is a need to r~ezone the back por•tions of the County Road C commercial pr•oper~ties to R-1. Scalze pointed out that if the commer•cial pr~oper~ties wer•e not rezoned and the City did not allow these pr•oper•ties access to the r•esidential str•eet, they could not be assessed for the cost of impr•oving the str•eet. LaValle asked Mr•. Boosalis his timetable for• constr•uction. Boosalis replied that constr•uction would begin as soon as all the necessary approvals ar~e received. Council discussed the possibility of a special meeting, however~, Fahey noted that Mr. Boosalis needs some time to get pur•chase agr•eements finalized for• some of the pr•oper~ties on County Road C. The City cannot r•ezone any property at P~r. Boosalis's request that he doesn't own. Page -3-