07-13-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council July 13, 1988 Car~l a Lane Sher•i ff' s Depar•tment about i noper~abl e car~s on Car•1 a Lane. Improvement (Cont.) With r•egard to tr•affic visibility, Public Works feels that ther•e is only one tree that is obstr•ucting visibility and this tr•ee will be trimmed. Olson r~equested that when Public Wor•ks does the tr~imming that he can meet with them on the issue to point out visibility pr~oblems he has obser~ved. Ellington asked about the compost pile and other~ inoper•able vehicles in the area. Collova suggested that any additional problems be dir~ected to the Building Inspector for~ action. Ellington asked if shr•uber~y along the ditch on Keller• Parkway was the responsibility of the City. The City Cler•k pointed out that Keller• Par•kway is a County Road and, ther•efor•e, the County's responsibility. Recess At this point in the meeting, 9:35 P.M., the Council took a shor•t r~ecess. The meeting was r•econvened at 9:45 P.P9. Bingo Hall Jan Sher~man, repr•esenting Little Canada Bingo Nall, appeared befor•e the Sign Council regar•ding a fr•ee-standing sign the bingo hall would like to er•ect. Sher~man r•epor•ted that in June of 1986 the bingo hall r•eceived a permit to er~ect a free-standing sign in the same location as the telephone company sign. However~, this sign was never• er•ected. The bingo hall would now like to pr•oceed with the sign. Sherman r~epor~ted that people ar~e having difficulty locating the bingo hall. Fahey pointed out that the June, 1986 per•mit has expir•ed. Fahey also pointed out that the City has one of the most liberal sign or•dinances i n the Metr~o ar•ea. Fahey suggested that the bui 1 di ng owner~, Mr•. Shor~t, come into the City Center• and make an application for a new sign per~mit. Fahey repor•ted that the sign will have to meet City or•dinance r•equir•ements. The City Planner~ repor~ted that a conditional use permit is necessar•y for~ a second fr~ee-standing sign on a site. Collova r•epor~ted that the Building Inspector infor•med him that when the 1986 per~mit was appr~oved it was under• the condition that the existing Gr•abel sign was r~emoved and combined with the new sign. The Building Inspector has infor~med Mr. Shor~t that a conditional use per~mit is necessary for~ a second fr~ee-standing sign. The City Planner agreed that due to the multiple uses of the site a Page -13-