10-26-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MIMUTES City Council October 26, 1988 Multiple The next area reviewed was Ryan Industrial Park. The City Planner Rezonings has r•ecommended that this proper•ty r~emain zoned I-1. The Planning (Cont.) Commission has supported that recommendation. The Planner~ also recommended that the Bwana Ar•chery and Best Auto properties remain I-1 since this is the use of that pr•operty and the property does not impact on the development of Country Drive. The Planner r•eviewed his proposal for• I-P zoning east of Ryan Industrial Park. Fahey asked if the soils in that area were poor. The City Engineer~ replied that ther•e wer•e some poor soils in that anea. Roger• Stanke pointed out that there ar•e some metal buildings in the ar•ea pr•oposed to be rezoned I-P and asked if the buildings could be r•ebuilt if they burned down. Fahey replied that a variance would be necessar•y to allow the buildings to be r~ebuilt. Blesener• felt that the area proposed by the Planner• for I-P should be rezoned to I-P. Blesener pointed out that most of the property is vacant and felt the City had to consider~ the long ter~m. Frattalone requested that his pr~operty remain I-1 due to the poor soils. Fr~attalone pointed out that he has planned ponding on his site. Frattalone again pointed out that the pr•oper•ty is a demolition landfill and any building developed on the site would require pylons. Fr•attalone repor•ted that a small building was most feasible to be developed on the site with the r•emainder~ to be used for• outdoor• stor~age. However, Frattalone stated that he was not opposed to building a block building on the site. Blesener pointed out that another City zoned some pr•operty PUD and asked if this could be an alternative to I-P. A PUD would allow the City the flexibility of pr~ecluding metal buildings but allowing more outdoor• storage. The Planner• agreed that this was a possibility. Blesener pointed out that with PUD zoning, the City can wor•k with a developer and can input into the type of development that goes in. Fahey suggested that the proposal to rezone this area to PUD be sent back to the Planning Commission for~ their r•eview and comment. Fahey suggested that this would be a good alternative given the poor soils in the area. Fahey noted that another public hearing would be necessary to consider a PUD zoning. Blesener suggested that PUD zoning be consider•ed for• the area nor•th of the North Star EstatesTr•ailer~Par•kandsouth of the r•ailroad pr~operty. Page -10-