10-26-88 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES City Council October 26, 1988 Plultiple Scalze pointed out that the County pr~oper•ty was once considered for• a Rezonings librar•y. (Cont.) The Planner commented that if a libr•ary wer~e to be located on that site, the proper•ty would need to be rezoned to Public. Scalze did not believe there would be high-gr•ade development in this area along Rice Str•eet due to the r~esidential development on the west side of Rice Street. Collova stated that he felt B-3 zoning would be appr•opriate for• the Fleischhacker proper•ty. Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 88-10-454 - APPROVING THE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY AQUTTING RICE STREET AS SHOWN ON THE CITY PLFlNNING COMMISSION'S PROPOSAL TO B-3 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE FLEISCHHACKER PROPERTY WHICH THE COUNCIL ALSO REZONES TO B-3 The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr•. Collova. Ayes (5) Blesener, Collova, LaValle, Fahey, Scalze. Nays (0). Resolution declar•ed adopted. This r•esolution appear~s in Resolution Book No. 20, Page 469. The next area considered was the ar~ea of the Yorkton developments west of the Water Works pr~operty. The City Planner• has proposed this area to be zoned I-P and the Planning Commission supported this recommendation. Blesener pointed out that Qill Ger~vais indicated at the Planning Commission meeting that he did not oppose the r•ezoning of his pr•oper•ty to I-P. The only opposition to the r•ezoning is fr~om the Buck Blacktop proper•ty. Blesener pointed out that even under~ I-P zoning, ther•e is expansion allowed for~ the Duck Blacktop building. Scalze pointed out that Bill 6er~vais mentioned that his and his mother•'s pr~operty would be sold as one parcel and suggested that the Rose Gervais property be rezoned to I-P as well. The Planner~ had r•ecommended that this parcel remain I-1. The r•epr•esentative from Duck Blacktop indicated that he was concerned about what would happen if the existing building burned down and ther~e was the need to r•eplace the building. Blesener stated that he would not oppose the r•ebuilding of a str•uctur~e if there was the need. However•, he was concer•ned about how the proper•ty mi ght be r~edevel oped. If the pr•oper•ty r•emai ns I-1 , the Ci ty woul d not be able to pr•event a metal building from being developed. Blesener• felt Page -7-