Laserfiche WebLink
P1INUTES <br />City Council <br />Jan. 11, 1989 <br />Nor~th Star~ a place of shelter or appr~oved evacuation plan to a reasonable <br />Mobilehome shelter for• its r•esidents and the plan must be appr•oved by the <br />Park local City by Mar~ch 1, 1989. <br />(Cont.l <br />Husnick again pointed out that he <br />agreed to a <br />trade-off with the <br /> City that in r•eturn for a second access to the par•k he would not <br /> have to provide an on-site stor•m shelter~. Hus nick pointed out <br /> that the access cost $35,000. <br />Fahey replied that the City has now been charged with enfor•cing <br />State Law which was not in effect at the time the second access <br />issue was r•esolved. Fahey asked what will happpn if the plan for <br />the park is not approved by March lst. <br />The City Attorney replied that the State Health Depar•tment would be <br />notified and they would r~equest the County Attorney to abate the <br />unlawful operation of the mobilehome par~k. <br />Fahey stated that a copy of the State law will be provided to Husnick <br />along with any past Council meeting minutes that are located. Fahey <br />suggested that the matter be tabled for two weeks to give Husnick <br />an oppor~tunity to r~evise the plan for• the mobilehome par~k. Other•wise, <br />the plan will be denied and the State Health Depar•tment and County <br />Attor•ney infor•med. <br />A r•esident of Fr•idley Terracz Mobilehome Park outlined the situation <br />in the park she r•esides in which also involved access pr•oblems. <br />Husnick pointed out the issue of liability insurance and its high <br />cost. <br />Fahey pointed out that any shelter that the par•k owners might <br />constr•uct would have to meet the standarcis of the State Health <br />Department. The City will use these standar•ds as well. <br />Husnick again raised the issue that apar•tment owners ar~e not being <br />required to provide stor•m shelters. <br />Scalze pointed out that this matter was debated by the State <br />Legislature and the debate was concluded. This City has now been <br />charged with enfor~cing the State law. <br />Fahey felt the plan should be r•ejected at this time and the ball <br />should be put in the park owner•s cour•t to comply with the Law. <br />Husnick pointed out that he is out-of-town quite a bit. <br />The Council pointed out that there are other owner•s of the par•k and <br />suggested that Mr. Husnick get together• with these partners to <br />resolve the situation. The Council pointed out that it is the <br />park owner~s' responsibility to develop an adequate plan. Any <br />information the City can provide to the owners will be provided. <br />Page -9- <br />