Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />October 25, 1989 <br />Krienke objected to previous statements that his lot <br />was 66 feet in width, reporting that it is 75 feet <br />wide. <br />Upon motion by Blesener, seconded by Collova, the <br />public hearing was closed. <br />Krienke asked how the County Road C property owners <br />would be reimbursed for the downzoning of their <br />property. <br />Fahey stated that based on the opinion of the City <br />Attorney, the City is not required to reimburse <br />property owners since there is a remaining use of the <br />property and no taking has occurred. The City Council <br />is merely exercising its zoning authority which in <br />their judgement is in the best interest of the City. <br />Blesener again pointed out that the valuable commercial <br />property is that with frontage on County Road C. <br />Fahey again stated that he believed the development <br />proposal for the area is in the best interests of the <br />City, and he will vote in favor of the rezoning. <br />Krienke pointed out that Mr. Kukk presently uses his <br />property as a commercial use. Krienke asked if Kukk <br />would still be allowed to use the back portion of his <br />property as commercial if it were rezoned. <br />Scalze pointed out that Mr. Kukk's shop is in the front <br />portion of the site. <br />Mr. Kukk indicated that he has customers' cars parked <br />on the back of the site. <br />Scalze pointed out that Mr. Kukk was never given <br />authority to store cars in the back. Scalze stated <br />that auto body shops are not permitted uses in <br />commercial zoninge <br />Fahey asked if Mr. Kukk had a licensed business. <br />Mrs. Kukk replied that they first received their <br />business license from the City in 1964 and have renewed <br />it every year. <br />Page 16 <br />