Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />October 25, 1989 <br />Fahey stated that he was not troubled with Mr. Kukk <br />continuinq to use the front portion of his site as he <br />currently is, however, when homes develop in the back, <br />he felt the back of the Kukk site would need to be <br />cleaned up and that storage should not occur in the <br />back portion of the property. <br />Kukk reported that if the City requires him to buffer <br />on his commercial property, he will not have enough <br />property left for his business. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 89-10-520 - APPROVING THE REZONING OF <br />THE NORTH 135 FEET OF 89, 83, 77, AND 73 WEST COUNTY <br />ROAD C FROM B-3 (GENERAL BUSINESS) TO RESIDENTIAL-ONE <br />CONSISTENT WITH THE DISCUSSION WHICH HAS OCCURRED OVER <br />THE PAST 12 TO 18 MONTHS AND BASED ON THE REPORTS <br />SUBMITTED BY THE CITY PLANNER SUPPORTING THE REZONING <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Mr. <br />Fahey. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, Fahey, Scalze, Collova, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />Scalze asked the status of approval of the amended plan <br />showing the new road location. <br />The City Planner reported that review and approval of a <br />final plat by the Planning Commission and City Council <br />is still required. The Planner stated that he will <br />also review the status of the preliminary plat. <br />Scalze reported that there are rumors being circulated <br />that the Tax Increment money from the commercial <br />building is being used by the developer to provide low <br />cost leases to tenants. <br />Fahey replied that this rumor is not true and pointed <br />out that the increment from the commercial building as <br />well as the increment from the homes that will be <br />constructed in the residential portion of the <br />development will be used solely to defray the cost of <br />the road project in the residential area and to reduce <br />the amount of assessments for the benefiting <br />properties, including the County Road C properties. <br />TIF is not being used to defray any costs for the <br />commercial portion of the development. <br />Page 17 <br />