My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-22-89 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
11-22-89 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:56:43 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:52:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 22, 1989 <br />Screening is planned for the western edge of the site. <br />The buildings will be one-story in height and will be <br />10,000 to 30,000 square feet in size. The exterior is <br />planned to be precast concrete and decorative concrete <br />block with glass and glazing. <br />Frattalone asked for an explanation of the timing of <br />the development. <br />Robert Murray, representing Mr. Brueggemann, reported <br />that they currently have the Gagne and Nadeau <br />properties under contract. It will take about one to <br />two years to complete the first two to three buildings, <br />and the remaining phases would be developed after that <br />time. <br />Frattalone was concerned that it would take two to <br />three years before her property is developed. <br />Frattalone reported that she currently rents her <br />property as a residential use, and asked if the City <br />will be placing restrictions on the use of her land, <br />asking if it could be rented to a business. <br />Blesener pointed out that Frattalone could continue to <br />use her property as it is currently being use. Any <br />questions as to renting the property to a business, <br />would be best directed to the City Planner. <br />Fahey asked if access for the future development of the <br />Fasciana property would be provided via Country Drive. <br />Murray replied that an ingress/egress easement would be <br />provided for any future development that might occur on <br />the Fasciana property to keep commercial traffic on <br />Country Drive. <br />Blesener pointed out that these details would be looked <br />at more thoroughly as development plans are presented <br />for the various buildings. <br />Scalze pointed out that the subdivision will need to be <br />reviewed by the Park Commission so that they can <br />address the issue of a park charge on the property. <br />There was no one else from the general public present <br />wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Fahey, seconded by Blesener, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.