My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-90 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
03-28-90 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 2:59:58 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />March 28, 1990 <br />Arkell asked if there were other sites within the City <br />which the Council would consider for this proposal with <br />Arkell pointing out that two smaller sites would be <br />acceptable if one larger site was not available, <br />It was pointed out that the property being discussed is <br />zoned B-3 adjacent to Little Canada Road, with Fahey <br />commenting that he did not know the neighborhood <br />reaction to senior housing on only this portion of <br />property. It was also pointed out that there may be a <br />site near the Venetian Inn that might interest Mr. <br />Arkell. <br />Blesener pointed out that he would like to see <br />additional senior housing on the site adjacent to <br />Garden Terrace, however, pointed out that the property <br />is not large enough for the number of units Mr. Arkell <br />is proposing. <br />Again Mr. Arkell stated that he would be interested in <br />two smaller sites. It was pointed out that the land <br />adjacent to Garden Terrace is currently under option, <br />however, if that option is not renewed, The Cottages <br />would approach the owner. <br />Blesener stated that he would not vote to approve the <br />development of 100 units on the site adjacent to Garden <br />Terrace. <br />Arkell stated that the concensus that he is hearing is <br />that the City would be interested in the proposal if <br />adequate land can be found. <br />Scalze pointed out that the proposal submitted to the <br />Jackson Street property owners a few years ago was for <br />senior apartments. Scalze stated that she was not sure <br />how the neighbors would feel about the development <br />proposal that Mr. Arkell is proposing, <br />Fahey stated that if Little Canada residents could be <br />given priority for occupancy, the City would be more <br />receptive to the proposal. <br />Arkell replie~ <br />Little Canada <br />efforts could <br />Collova asked <br />assistance is <br />i that there is no legal way to give <br />residents priority, however, marketing <br />be targeted to Little Canada residents. <br />what happens to the units after TIF <br />no longer provided. <br />Page 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.