My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-90 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
06-27-90 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:02:12 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 27, 1990 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 90-6-304 - AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY <br />AND CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO REVIEW THE CITY LIQUOR <br />LICENSING ORDINANCE WITH THE INTENT OF BRINGING THE <br />ORDINANCE UP-TO-DATE WITH STATE STATUTES <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, LaValle, Collova, Scalze, Fahey. <br />Nays (o). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />Council reviewed the correspondence from the City <br />Planner regarding the City's liquor licensing system, <br />specifically requirements for on-sale liquor licenses. <br />Council discussed the possibility of having three <br />categories of on-sale licenses, the first would be an <br />"A" license which would require that the establishment <br />have a certain number of square feet and serve food as <br />well as liquor. The second category would be a"B" <br />license, which would require an establishment's <br />principle business is food. The "C" license would be <br />tavern-type business. <br />The Council suggested that the City Planner and City <br />Administrator study this proposal and make a <br />recommendation to the Council for specific criteria for <br />each of the categories of on-sale licenses. <br />Blesener pointed out that the fees in Section 702.050 <br />should be called "application fees". <br />SUBDIVISION The City Attorney pointed out that the Council acted <br />EASEMENTS on several subdivisions this evening. The Attorney <br />asked if the Council wanted ownership of these <br />properties confirmed so that the City would be assured <br />of getting the easements its needs. <br />The Council directed the City Engineer to review the <br />various subdivisions to determine whether or not <br />easements are necessary. If they are, it was the <br />concensus of the Council that the City Attorney should <br />verify title to ensure that the easements are filed <br />against the property. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved <br />its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 90-6-305 - INSTRUCTING THE CITY ENGINEER <br />TO REVIEW THE SUBDIVISIONS ACTED UPON BY THE COUNCIL <br />THIS EVENING TO DETERMINE THE NEED FOR DRAINAGE AND <br />Page 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.