My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-90 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
06-27-90 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:02:12 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 27, 1990 <br />SLUMBERLAND/ The City Engineer presented the Council with a <br />DESOTO STR. feasibility report for DeSoto Street watermain <br />WATERMAIN extension. This improvement is necessary in order <br />to supply 5lumberland's needs for additional water for <br />fire fighting purposes. Slumberland is proposing an <br />addition to their buildinq. The Engineer described the <br />details of the improvements. Total estimated cost of <br />the improvement is $53,000, and it is anticipated that <br />if the City assesses the residential property in the <br />area for their portion of the improvement, <br />5lumberland's share of the cost would be approximately <br />$28,000. <br />The Engineer reported that at this point the Council <br />should accept the feasibility report and Slumberland <br />should be approached for agreement. <br />Scalze questioned the feasibility of assessing the <br />residential properties, pointing out that it may never <br />be feasible to improve DeSoto Street since there is <br />only one side of the street that can be assessed. <br />The Engineer pointed out that watermain is needed in <br />order for Slumberland to expand. The Engineer also <br />indicated that the improvement would benefit the entire <br />industrial park as well as loop the system. <br />Scalze suggested that Slumberland may have to pay for <br />the entire improvement. <br />The Engineer reported that the improvement is for the <br />public good. <br />The City Administrator reported that there are a <br />variety of ways to address the assessment issue. The <br />Administrator reported that a property cannot be <br />assessed for an improvement if it does not benefit the <br />property. However, there may be some options the City <br />can use. <br />The Engineer suggested that assessments could be <br />deferred until the property develops. <br />Scalze pointed out that if the assessment is deferred, <br />the City has to pick up the cost, plus the property <br />owners have interest accruing on the assessment. <br />Mr. Collova introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />Page 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.