Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 27, 1990 <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 90-6-296 - APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR INSTALLATION OF 1,000 GALLON <br />PROPANE STORAGE TANK, PUMP METER AND HOSE AT 300 LITTLE <br />CANADA ROAD AS SUBMITTED BY M-V GAS COMPANY SUBJECT TO <br />COMPLIANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF TAE CITY PLANNER <br />AS CONTAINED IN HIS REPORT DATED JUNE 8, 1990 WITH THE <br />EXCEPTION OF RECOMMENDATION #1 DEALING WITH LANDSCAPING <br />FROM THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Blesener. <br />Ayes (4) LaValle, Blesener, Collova, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />KUSH The Commission reviewed the application submitted by <br />PROPERTY Steven Kush, 3033 Arcade Street, for the division of <br />DIVI5ION his property into three lots. The Planning Commission <br />recommended approval of this property division. <br />Collova asked.if there were future plans for the <br />extension of Leeward Way. <br />The City Planner replied that it is possible to extend <br />Leeward Way another 300 feet to the south and connect <br />it with an extension of Allen Avenue that has not yet <br />been improved. <br />Mr. Kush reported that if the property division is <br />approved, he would like to construct a new house on <br />Tract A in front of the existing house. The old house <br />would be removed from the property once the new house <br />is completed. Kush reported that the existing house is <br />45 years old and it is economically unfeasible to <br />improve it so that it meets City Code requirements. <br />There was no one from the general public present <br />wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Collova asked what Kush proposed the setback to be for <br />the new home on Tract A, pointing out the large <br />setbacks of the homes adjacent. <br />Kush replied that his existinq house is about 225 feet <br />back from the property line. The new house would be <br />constructed in front of the existing home and would be <br />forward of the adjacent homes. However, it would line <br />up with the newer homes in the area. <br />Page 5 <br />