My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-90 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
07-25-90 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:02:51 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JULY 25, 1990 <br />non-conforming situation. Fahey questioned what the <br />City would want to allow something that is substandard. <br />Fahey also pointed out that if the City allows the <br />Stewart property division without improved road <br />frontage, it will be faced with similar requests. <br />Blesener suggested that the matter be tabled until the <br />City Engineer can put together some cost estimates for <br />the road. Once the estimates are available, the <br />applicant can decide whether he wants to proceed with <br />the property division. <br />The Engineer indicated that he will put cost estimates <br />together, and suggested surfacing of the cul-de-sac in <br />granular material rather than blacktop. <br />Scalze pointed out that there must be a turn around for <br />emergency vehicles, and the City must be able to <br />maintain the cul-de-sac area. <br />There was no one from the general public wishing to <br />comment further on this matter. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 90-7-341 - TABLING ACTION ON THE STEWART <br />REQUEST FOR PROPERTY DIVISION AND VARIANCE FROM THE <br />CODE REQUIREMENT OF IMPROVED ROAD FRONTAGE UNTIL THE <br />AUGUST 8, 1990 COUNCIL MEETING IN ORDER TO GIVE THE <br />CITY ENGINEER AN OPPORTUNITY TO PUT TOGETHER COST <br />ESTIMATES FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) Blesener, Scalze, Collova, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />REZONING OF Fahey opened the public hearing to consider the <br />NEW FIRE rezoning of property from B-3 to Public to accommodate <br />STATION SITE a new fire station. Fahey pointed out that the <br />Planning Commission has recommended approval of the <br />rezoning. <br />There was no one present wishing to comment on this <br />matter. <br />Upon motion by Blesener, seconded by Soalze, the public <br />hearing was closed. <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.