Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 8, 1990 <br />Stanke suggested that the improvement be postponed <br />until the spring, indicating that with the high water <br />table in the area, the main should not be installed <br />under frost conditions. <br />The City Engineer reported that it will be a decision <br />of the Building Inspector whether or not to allow the <br />addition to be occupied without proper fire protection. <br />The Engineer agreed that the City may not want the <br />watermain installed under frost conditions. <br />Mr. Fahey introduced the following resolution and moved <br />its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 90-8-369 - APPROVING AN OCCUPANCY PERMIT <br />FOR THE STANKE BUILDING ADDITION UPON MR. ROGER STANKE <br />ENTERING INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH TAE CITY, IN <br />A FORM APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND CITY ATTORNEY, <br />ADDRESSING THE FINALIZATION OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE <br />SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN THE ADDITION AS WELL AS <br />CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN FROM THE BUILDING TO THE <br />EXISTING WATERMAIN UNDER THE ROADWAY, WITH STANKE TO <br />PAY TAE COST OF THE FLEXIBLE WATERMAIN PIPE AS <br />5PECIFIED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, AS WELL AS INSTALLATION <br />OF THAT PIPE, WITH COST OF INSTALLATION TO INCLUDE <br />ROADWAY RECONSTRUCTION, AND THE CITY THEREAFTER ASSUMES <br />RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THAT PORTION OF THE <br />PIPE WITHIN THE ROADWAY EASEMENT, WITH CONSTRUCTION OF <br />THE INSIDE SPRINKLER SYSTEM TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 30 <br />DAYS, THE NECESSARY WATERMAIN PIPE ORDERED AND <br />INSTALLED AS SOON AS DETERMINED FEASIBLE BY THE CITY <br />ENGINEER, AND MR. STANKE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE <br />COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH DRAFTING OF THE DEVELOPMENT <br />AGREEMENT AS WELL AS OTHER COSTS RELATED TO THE PROJECT <br />INVOLVING CITY ATTORNEY AND/OR CITY ENGINEER TIME, AND <br />FINALLY REQUIRING PUBLIC WORKS AND/OR THE CITY <br />ENGINEER'S OFFICE TO INSPECT AND APPROVE THE <br />INSTALLATION OF THE WATERMAIN WITAIN THE ROAD <br />RIGHT-OF-WAY <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Collova. <br />Ayes (5) Fahey, Collova, Blesener LaValle, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />Council discussed the possibility of limiting tonage on <br />Ryan Drive with Stanke suggesting that heavy loads be <br />limited beyond the property line of the Belland <br />property. <br />Page 14 <br />