08-08-90 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 8, 1990 The City Administrator pointed out that if any of the lower lots connect to watermain in the future, it may be difficult to recover the improvement costs since there is a private party involved in the assessment situation. The City Attorney felt the matter could be worked out. STEWART The City Engineer reviewed his report dated July 31st VARIANCE & regarding the extension of improved street to serve the PROPERTY Stewart property on Rose Place. DIVISION Blesener asked if the Buche property would share in the cost of the improvement. The City Engineer pointed out that if the matter goes to a public improvement, it would be his feeling that the only property owner in favor would be Stewart. The Engineer pointed out that there may be property on the north side of the street that could be assessed, but he was not sure how much wetland area covers that property. Fahey suqgested that Mr. Stewart discuss improvement costs with Mr. Buche and the to the north to determine whether or not favor. Fahey stated that if the road we three properties, he would prefer to see width. the property owner they are in re to serve it 26 feet in Collova asked why the watermain portion of the improvement was necessary. The City Engineer replied that the Building Inspector will look at the fire protection situation and the Engineer thought that the location of the nearest fire hydrant was outside the radius for sufficient fire protection. Mr. Stewart disagreed and reported that there is a watermain in front of the adjacent house. Stewart also indicated that the only buildable area on the property to the north would be adjacent to Savage Lane. Soalze stated that she is not in favor of the variance requested by Stewart for a lot that is not located on an improved street. Scalze felt that granting such a variance would set a precedent, and pointed out that there are a lot of properties in the City similar to Stewart's. Page 8