12-26-90 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 26, 1990 sections with regard to State Law. Blesener pointed out the wording on page 67 with regard to the number of licenses the City has, pointing out that the City currently has one license available and two additional which were granted by the Legislature. Fahey suggested that prior to adoption of the Ordinance, the City should submit it to the liquor license holders within the City to get their comments. LaValle expressed concern with the Wine License fee as indicated on page 51. It was pointed out that the current fee is $100 and the proposed Ordinance states $1,125. Fahey suggested that the wine License fee remain at $100. LaValle pointed out that on page 62 the word "days" should be changed to "years". LaValle asked if the liquor license fees for an "A License" should be different from those for a"B License". Fahey did not believe there was much difference in the value of the license believing that the value was actually the availability of the license. LaValle felt that the Ordinance should indicate that the $500 investigative fee is a one-time fee and collected at initial application. Blesener suggested that the reference to "drug stores" on pages 63 and 66 in the proposed Ordinance be looked at to determine if this reference is in the City's existing Ordinance. Blesener asked what the reference to the applicant providing financial responsibility meant. The City Attorney replied that this means that insurance coverage is required. Blesener questioned Section 702.100 (2). The City Attorney replied that he would check on the source of that provision. Council discussed the provisions in Section 703.030 which set the minimum standards for the various classes of licenses. Blesener suggested that there should not be the two Page 13