My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-13-91 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
02-13-91 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:07:11 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />February 13, 1991 <br />the City should provide some assistance to these small <br />businesses. Hanson pointed out the report from the <br />Building Inspector which outlines the number of <br />temporary signs issued during 1990. <br />Scalze felt the report showed that businesses are using <br />temporary signage within the context of the ordinance. <br />Scalze was concerned about the practice of amending the <br />City's Sign Ordinance when one business requests a <br />revision. Scalze pointed out that the Ordinance was <br />initially drafted after input from businesses and <br />residents and she did not support amending the <br />Ordinance due to one request. <br />Hanson again pointed out the seasonal nature of an <br />accounting business, and pointed out the limits of the <br />temporary sign provisions during the tax season. <br />It was pointed out that the shoppinq center could <br />install a reader board for use of its tenants. <br />Hanson agreed, but reported that the shopping center <br />owner was concerned about tenant competition for the <br />use of the reader board. <br />Hanson reported that the City of Vadnais Heights has <br />the same Sign Ordinance as Little Canada's, however, <br />unless the is a fragrant violation, the ordinance is <br />not tightly enforced. Hanson suggested that perhaps <br />the City should have a period of non-enforcement of the <br />Sign Ordinance for temporary signs and see what happens <br />with these signs in the City. <br />Scalze did not feel the Sign Ordinance should be <br />touched unless another committee is organized of <br />business owners and residents to review it and make a <br />recommendation. Scalze pointed out that some <br />communities do not allow temporary signs as all. <br />It was noted that there was not sufficient Council <br />support to change the existing Ordinance. <br />BODY SHOP Hanson reported a parking violation by a body shop <br />PARKING within the City. Parking at the body shop is running <br />VIOLATION over onto the neighbor's property. Hanson reported <br />that the Building Inspector is looking at the permit <br />for the body shop to determine the amount of parking <br />that was initially approved as well as addressing the <br />parking trespass. <br />Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.