My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-91 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
04-10-91 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:08:02 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:53:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 10, 1991 <br />Collova asked the width of other City trails. <br />Sanders reported that the newer trails in Pioneer Park <br />and Thunder Bay Park are 8 feet wide. Older trails are <br />5 feet wide. Sanders reported that 8 feet is a more <br />standard width for contractors and a more comfortable <br />width for bikers and pedestrians. <br />Quirin felt the path improvement would be an asset to <br />the area noting the numerous multi-family units in the <br />immediate area. <br />Blesener also pointed out the office buildings in the <br />area feeling that employees of the various businesses <br />would use the path as well. <br />Bob DeBace asked if any parking areas or lighting of <br />the path was proposed. <br />Sanders replied that neither are proposed at this time <br />since the path is meant for neighborhood use. <br />Mark Malsam pointed out that future extension of the <br />path would have to cross railroad tracks, and asked how <br />this is proposed to be accomplished. Malsam also <br />raised the issue of liability for a path crossing <br />railroad tracks. <br />Sanders replied that the railroad crossing has not been <br />addressed as yet, however, he would anticipate a <br />surface crossing. Sanders asked how many trains ran <br />through the area each day. <br />DeBace estimated 2 to 3 trains per day. <br />LaValle stated that his concern was that the path did <br />not go anywhere at this time. LaValle felt the path <br />should be presented as part of a complete package, <br />including a small picnic area and approval of the <br />railroad for a crossing. <br />Pam Kannegister, 110 Yorkton Ridge, reported that most <br />of her neighborhood opposed the pathway. Concern was <br />that the path would attract more people to the area and <br />that wildlife would be scared away. <br />Hanson asked if the City had any greater liability on <br />paths if roller blades and skateboards are allowed on <br />the paths. <br />The City Attorney replied that he was not aware of any <br />cases relating to substantial exposure in those <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.