Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 14, 1991 <br />PARKING AT The City Administrator reviewed Public Works's <br />56 WEST recommendation regarding posting no parking on Little <br />LITTLE Canada Road for the length of the Kenneth Willis <br />CANADA ROAD property at 56 W. Little Canada Road. <br />Kenneth Willis appeared before the Council and outlined <br />the problem he is having with patrons from Saxon Lanes <br />parking along his property. Willis also submitted <br />pictures of improvements he has made along his property <br />which are being damaged by the people parking in front <br />of his house. <br />Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 91-8-276 - REQUESTING THE COUNTY POST NO <br />PARKING ON LITTLE CANADA ROAD FOR THE LENGTH OF THE <br />PROPERTY LOCATED AT 56 WEST LITTLE CANADA ROAD AT THE <br />REQUEST OF THE PROPERTY OWNER, KENNETH WILLIS, AND <br />BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF PUBLIC WORKS <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (5) Blesener, LaValle, Hanson, Scalze, Collova. <br />Nays (o). <br />Resolution declared adopted. <br />Council's consensus was that the County and Public <br />Works should look at the area and extend the no parking <br />beyond the Willis' property if they determine it <br />necessary. <br />THUNDER BAY The City Engineer reviewed the bids received for the <br />IMPROVEMENT Thunder Bay drainage improvement, reporting that the <br />BIDS low base bid was received from Frattalone Excavating in <br />the amount of $88,655. The Engineer explained that the <br />bid was broken down into two parts. Part A included <br />drainage ditches A, B, and C, while Part B, as well as <br />Alternates 1 and 2, included drainage ditch D. <br />The Engineer reported that the City Administrator has <br />met with the property owners on the three choices they <br />have for improvement of Ditch D, however, the property <br />owners have not decided what type of improvement they <br />want at this point. <br />Council discussed the matter, and its consensus was to <br />award the low bid contingent upon a final decision for <br />Ditch D. By awarding the bid now rather than waiting <br />for the final decision, the contractor can get the work <br />scheduled. <br />It was pointed out that the fourth option for Ditch D <br />would be no improvement whatsoever. <br />PAGE 16 <br />