My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-91 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1991
>
10-23-91 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:11:04 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:54:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 23, 1991 <br />The City Planner gave some examples, and pointed out <br />that outdoor storage is restricted from the I-P <br />District. <br />LaValle asked why truck repair was an accessory use in <br />the District, but auto repair was not. <br />The City Planner explained that truck repair is <br />accessory to an industrial use in the I-P District. <br />That is, an industrial business would be allowed to <br />repair the trucks used in that business. Auto repair <br />is clearly not a permitted or accessory use in the I-P <br />District. The Planner noted that Spectrum Auto was <br />discovered because they put up a sign on Centerville <br />Road. Commercial businesses are dependent on such <br />exposure. The truck repair business that existed <br />previously was almost invisible, however, truck repair <br />that is not accessory to a commercial business, is also <br />not a permitted use in the I-P District. <br />Spectrum Auto reported that they put a sign up so <br />customers could find them. However, they do not <br />advertise and are not using the sign to attract <br />business. Spectrum stated that the sign could be <br />eliminated. <br />The City Planner stated that the sign is not the issue, <br />but rather a distinction between commercial and <br />industrial businesses. <br />Hanson stated that it is apparent that there is not <br />enough support for the text amendment, and suggested <br />that the Council deal with the issue of the relocation <br />period. <br />Blesener stated that he would support a relocation <br />period through the end of the lease. <br />There was no one from the general public present <br />wishing to address this matter. <br />Upon motion by Blesener, seconded by Collova, the <br />public hearing was closed. <br />Scalze asked how long the sign could remain, pointing <br />out that it is a temporary sign. <br />Spectrum replied that the sign is permanent and meets <br />Code requirements. <br />Hanson stated that the operation was a clean one, and <br />one he would like to see be allowed to remain. <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.