10-28-92 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 28, 1992 he has indicated to the applicants that the issue in considering their proposal will be site improvement requirements and building quality. The applicant will be submitting plans showing what they are proposing to do with the property. Scalze stated that she had a lot of questions regarding this proposal. Mrs. Scalze introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 92-10-375 - CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR OUTDOOR STORAGE FOR 2929 COUNTRY DRIVE PENDING A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. Ayes (5) 5calze, LaValle, Aanson, Blesener, Collova. Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. VARIANCE Hanson noted that the Planning Commission has tabled 90 ROSEWOOD action on the application for side yard setback DRIVE variance on a corner lot for 90 Rosewood Drive as requested by George Krienke. Therefore, the Council will table action on this item pending a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Blesener noted that the Code requires an 80 foot width for a corner lot, not the 75 feet indicated in the City Planner's report. Blesener suggested that since the lot is substandard by 10 feet in width, that the City should only consider a variance of l0 feet versus the 14 feet being requested. Blesener suggested that the situation may be one where the house being proposed is too large for the lot. Mr. Blesener introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION N0. 92-10-376 - CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE APPLICATION FOR SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR 90 ROSEWOOD DRIVE PENDING A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. Ayes (5) Blesener, LaValle, Aanson, Scalze, Collova. Nays (Oj. Resolution declared adopted. Page 4