My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-93 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
08-25-93 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 3:39:13 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:55:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINi1TES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 25, 1993 <br />matter up again. <br />Morelan asked about the impact on the City's budget. <br />The City Administrator replied that money was not <br />budgeted for this expense, however, there are funds in <br />the special projects area of the City Attorney's budget <br />that can be used to cover these additional costs. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 93-8-268 - APPROVING THE AMENDED <br />RETAINER AGREEMENT AS SUBMITTED BY TAE CITY ATTORNEY <br />The foregoinq resolution was duly seconded by Pedersen. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Pedersen, Hanson, Scalze, Morelan. <br />Nays (O). Resolution declared adopted. <br />STREET The City Administrator presented the proposed street <br />ASSESSMENT assessment policy reporting that the City Attorney <br />POLICY has completed his review and made some minor changes to <br />the policy. Examples of how assessments would be <br />calculated for varying situations have also been added <br />to the policy, as well as a map showing the <br />classifications of streets within the City. <br />Hanson pointed out that the street assessment policy is <br />very detailed, and actual application of the policy <br />will be needed to determine whether it is perfect or <br />not. <br />Morelan pointed out that the City has received a great <br />deal of citizen input on the policy. Morelan also <br />praised the City staff for its work on the project. <br />This policy was very much needed by the City, and <br />Morelan felt the product was a good one. <br />The Administrator commended the Council for its work on <br />the project, pointing out that a significant amount of <br />time had been spent developing the policy. <br />Pedersen asked how the policy would work for a lot with <br />the same City street on two sides of it. <br />The Administrator believed that the decision was to <br />consider such a lot as an odd-shaped lot, and apply the <br />assessment policy accordingly for that type lot. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />Page 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.