07-27-94 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL J[7i~Y 13 ~ 1994 Stockness stated that he did not like the appearance of a half wainscot. LaValle pointed out that a variance would not be needed if an additional 15% masonry were added. Pedersen pointed out that the result would be basically the same building that is being considered with an additional 15% masonry. Therefore, the variance being requested does not deviate much from the Code. Stockness pointed out that most developers would put the 50% masonry on the front of the building. However, he is proposing the wainscot in order to provide uniformity on the foundation. Stockness pointed out that the masonry actually steps down on the sides of the building, and he is considering 8 feet on the sides to balance out the appearance of the buildinq. Scalze pointed out that the additional masonry on the sides may bring the building into conformance with the 50% requirement. Morelan asked if the Planner if he believed that the property would never be developed in conformance with the I-P standards given soil conditions, the proximity of Ryan Industrial Park and the excavating business across the street. The Planner replied that that was difficult to predict. A developer could come in tomorrow, or the property could sit vacant for 25 years. Pedersen pointed out that the 50% requirement does not ensure a real fancy building. The Planner reported that typically the 50% masonry requirement is met on the front of the building and around windows and doors. Upon motion by Morelan, seconded by LaValle, the public hearing was closed. LaValle pointed out the condition of the Stockness building in Ryan Industrial Park. LaValle pointed out that Stockness is proposing a$500,000 building, and felt the project was a worthwhile one for the City. LaValle also pointed out that the building would be lo