Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />OCTOBER 26, 1994 <br />little control in this area. <br />The City Administrator stated that he would like to <br />know the public's perception of the job the City is <br />doing with regard to storm drainage and flood control, <br />pointing out that there are some pocket areas of the <br />City that may need attention. <br />Morelan stated that a lot of this will come down to <br />interpretation of the results of the survey by Decision <br />Resources. <br />Morris reported that respondents would be zoned so that <br />information can be pinpointed to a certain quadrant of <br />the City. <br />Morelan pointed out previous <br />Resources would retain phone <br />respondents could be contact <br />information it that was felt <br />if the Council Members had a <br />general. <br />statements that Decision <br />numbers so that <br />ad for additional <br />necessary. Morelan asked <br />position on the survey in <br />Scalze reported that it was her feeling that when the <br />initial survey was done in 1988, that was the beginning <br />of a two-step process. The important part of that <br />process is now, when the follow-up survey is done to <br />determine the movement and changes which have occurred <br />£rom when the first survey was done. <br />Morris reported that his analysis will include <br />comparisons between the results of both surveys. <br />Pedersen pointed out question #46 and felt the question <br />should go into more detail and determine which services <br />the citizen could either live without or would pay more <br />property taxes for to retain. <br />Scalze asked the purpose of question #11. <br />Morelan replied that he sugqested that question in an <br />attempt to determine what sorts of things people would <br />move to another City in order to obtain. Morelan <br />questioned the need for #2, and suggested that if <br />someone is planning to move from Little Canada within <br />the near future, why continue with the survey. <br />Greger suggested that perhaps the resident would be <br />3 <br />