Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />NOVEMBER 9, 1994 <br />Scalze stated that the trail was discussed as a public <br />safety issue. If the Jackson Street trail improvement <br />is to be deleted, there should be some discussion with <br />the neighborhood. <br />Morelan agreed that there should be some additional <br />discussion on the Jackson Street trail given the fact <br />that the City has petitions both for and against the <br />improvement. Morelan felt the matter should be <br />referred back to the Park & Recreation Commission so <br />they can meet with the neighbors. Morelan suggested <br />that perhaps this is how the process should have been <br />handled in the beginning. <br />Scalze pointed out that the Council held the meeting <br />with the neighbors on the Jackson Street trail. <br />Pedersen pointed out that the Park & Recreation <br />Commission is advisory in nature. Pedersen questioned <br />the need to reopen an issue that has already been <br />resolved. <br />Morelan pointed out that typically the Park & Rec <br />Commission works with the neighbors on screening <br />issues, etc. That part of the process was lost in not <br />funneling this issue to the Commission. <br />Pedersen again stated that the City Council felt the <br />trail was needed so why reopen the issue. <br />Morelan pointed out that the City received a petition <br />signed by most of the adjoining property owners <br />opposing the trail. <br />The City Administrator stated that the City has <br />received two petitions - one in favor and one opposed. <br />The Administrator also pointed out that the decision on <br />what happens with the Bluwood/Australian street <br />connection/cul-de-sac options could affect what happens <br />with the trail. <br />Morelan stated that the Council was rushed to make a <br />decision on the trail since at the time the street <br />reconstruction project was being considered. The <br />Council now has the opportunity to rethink the issue. <br />Morelan felt that given the petition in opposition, it <br />was prudent to do so. <br />6 <br />