Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANi7ARY 11, 1995 <br />that there is additional information that the Council <br />might want to consider on the 25th. Fahey pointed out <br />that the Planner feels Mr. Tima may have two dividable <br />lots if an additional 17 feet of right-of-way were <br />dedicated rather than 7. <br />The City Administrator again indicated that this is <br />initial information that still must be verified. <br />Fahey stated that where two options are potentially <br />equal and will each serve the neighborhood as well, he <br />would support the option favored by the neighborhood. <br />Fahey pointed out that staff will be putting together <br />additional information on the cost of the various <br />options including estimated cost of easements. Fahey <br />suggested that if the costs of the two options are <br />equal, the cul-de-sac should be put in, even if a <br />standard street right-of-way could be obtained for <br />Jackson Street, since this is what the neighborhood <br />prefers. <br />LaValle stated that the Council must look at the cost <br />and how the options affect the property owners. If the <br />cul-de-sac has a great impact on adjacent property, the <br />Council must consider that as well. <br />Pedersen stated that if all things were equal, that <br />would be fine, but the Council must consider the cost <br />of both options as well. <br />Scalze stated that the Council must consider whether <br />Tima has appropriate property to develop if he <br />dedicates 17 feet of road right-of-way. Scalze pointed <br />out that Mr. Tima is a taxpayer and has the right to <br />develop his property. Scalze stated that it is in the <br />entire City's best interest to get the road developed. <br />Fahey did not believe it would be financially feasible <br />for Mr. Tima to put in a 300 to 400 foot street in <br />order to develop two lots when access could be via the <br />cul-de-sacs. <br />Pedersen stated that that was true unless the cul-de- <br />sac option is more expensive. <br />Scalze pointed out that the City has the cost of the <br />street, but not a true cost of the cul-de-sac option. <br />11 <br />