Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 18, 1995 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Morelan, Scalze, Fahey, LaValle, Pedersen. <br />Nays (O). Resolution declared adopted. <br />LaValle pointed out that if bid prices necessitate a <br />cost greater than $45 per front foot to the property <br />owners for the street reconstruction, the issue will be <br />revisited. <br />IMP. NO. Fahey opened the public hearing to consider Improvement <br />94-7 - No. 94-7, improvement of Gilanderi Lane by water main <br />GILANDERI as well as street reconstruction, concrete <br />LANE curb and gutter, and storm drainage facilities. Fahey <br />pointed out that in November a neighborhood meeting was <br />held on this issue. At that meeting the majority of <br />the neighborhood favored the water main improvement. A <br />number of property owners opposed street reconstruction <br />and indicated opposition to dedicating the necessary <br />road right-of-way. <br />The City Engineer reviewed three options for <br />consideration. Option 1 includes water main and <br />improving the private road to 28 feet wide with <br />concrete curb and gutter. Option 2 includes water main <br />and replacing the disturbed portion of the private <br />street as is. Option 3 is for water main and upgrading <br />the strength of the disturbed portion of the private <br />street. <br />The Engineer reported that at the neighborhood meeting <br />there was some disagreement about what right-of-way MN <br />DOT owned. The Engineer stated that he contacted MN <br />DOT~s Land Management Office for this information, and <br />the Engineer presented a diagram showing MN DOT's <br />right-of-way. It was also determined that MN DOT has <br />some jurisdiction over the County Road B-2 right-of-way <br />as well. The Engineer pointed out that there are two <br />12 1/2 foot strips and one 14 foot strip of land <br />through this area over which MN DOT has no <br />jurisdiction. The purpose of these strips is not <br />known. <br />Wylie Bennett, 795 Viking Drive asked about the <br />frontage road parallel to Highway 36. <br />The Engineer reported that while MN DOT has <br />jurisdiction over that frontage road, they indicated <br />11 <br />