My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-18-95 Council Special Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
01-18-95 Council Special Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:31:00 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:56:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 18, 1995 <br />improvement, but at some point the City Council will <br />have to discuss it and take a position. <br />The City Administrator reported that the County has <br />been surveying in the area to get a better definition <br />of tree impact and drainage. Typically projects such <br />as this are field designed, with the County making <br />things fit. The County will take into consideration <br />the Council's position on the issue. The Administrator <br />reported that typically the County will just put in a <br />project, however, in this instance the City asked for <br />an informational meeting. <br />One property owner stated that they felt the water main <br />project and road project were tied together, and that <br />the water main project gave the County more reason to <br />widen the Keller Parkway pavement. <br />A property owner indicated that there are a lot of <br />brand new wells along Keller Parkway, and asked how it <br />was determined that the majority of the property owners <br />wanted water. <br />One property owner indicated that at the neighborhood <br />meeting about eight of the ten property owners present <br />indicated that they wanted water if the road <br />improvement proceeds. <br />Fahey asked how many of those present favored a water <br />main project if the road goes in. Five indicated that <br />they favored water main if the road project proceeds, <br />and four indicated that they were against. <br />One property owner felt it a possibility that the water <br />main project gives the County more reason to proceed <br />with the road project. <br />Scalze replied that the water main project has nothing <br />to do with the size of the street. <br />Fahey indicated that realistically the County will not <br />just resurface the existing pavement, but will upgrade <br />it to make it wider and safer. Fahey pointed out that <br />there is a need for a walkway or paved shoulder for <br />bikes and pedestrians. Whether the width ends up to be <br />32 feet, he was not sure. <br />Cardinal pointed out that there are only 40% of the <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.