09-13-95 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SEPTE[~SBIIt 13, 1995 Commission. Schroeder agreed that the City can handle the architectural review process using the Planning Commission and the City Planner. Fahey suggested that the language of this section be cleaned up. "Work with Roseville to meet common development objectives" was reviewed. The City Administrator reported that staff has been working with Roseville to establish a better dialog. There are definite advantages to both cities in linking pedestrian systems, for example. Scalze asked if Roseville should be sent a copy of the Development Guide. The City Administrator reported that he has informed Roseville that we would send them a copy once the Guide is closer to final form. Fahey agreed that there were common issues with the redevelopment of Rice Street that should be discussed with Roseville. However, felt the matter was similar to goal-setting. Unless measurements can be taken, it is difficult to determine if anything has been accomplished. Scalze suggested that the Development Guide be sent to Roseville. Roseville can review the Guide and provide input if they choose. Scalze reported that she heard the Roseville City Manager is excited about the redevelopment of Rice Street and the work Little Canada is doing since Rice Street is where most of eastern Roseville residents shop. Roseville's community development director may have input he would like to provide to the process. Fahey stated that Roseville's vision is probably set, and he did not want to debate Little Canada's vision with Roseville. Pedersen felt that Little Canada can tell Roseville that this is our goal and that we are willing to work with them. The beginning of a dialogue may mean a phone call from the City Administrator, our plan being sent to them, and a request for information on what they are doing. 13