My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-95 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
09-13-95 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:37:05 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:57:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINU'PES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTII~SBER 13, 1995 <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (5) Morelan, Scalze, Fahey, Pedersen, LaValle. <br />Nays (O). Resolution declared adopted. <br />ST. JUDE The City Administrator reported that the State is <br />MEDICAL turning back two parcels of land which are right-of- <br />VACATION way for Viking Drive to the City. St. Jude Medical <br />REQUEST is requesting the vacation of one of these parcels in <br /> order that they might construct a new sign at their <br /> facility on this property. The Administrator reported <br /> that there are compensation issues to consider <br /> especially in light of the fact that Viking Drive is a <br /> single-frontage street. When that street is <br /> reconstructed, there is only one side of the street <br /> which can be assessed. The Administrator suggested <br /> that it may be possible to define a small parcel to be <br /> vacated back to St. Jude to accommodate their sign <br /> plans, and then deal with the compensation issue for <br /> the rest of the property at a later date. <br /> Morelan asked if a small piece could be vacated without <br /> subdividing it. <br />The Administrator agreed that the City may have to <br />subdivide. <br />LaValle asked if St. Jude Medical would be interested <br />in buying the entire piece of property. <br />The Administrator replied that that is a possibility, <br />but not his proposal tonight. The Administrator <br />suggested that in order to accommodate St. Jude's <br />desire for a new sign, he is suggesting that a small <br />piece be vacated for the sign. The transfer of a small <br />parcel should not effect the buildability of the rest <br />of the parcel. <br />Scalze suggested that at this point the City let St. <br />Jude erect the sign on the right-of-way. <br />The Administrator replied that the Zoning Ordinance <br />requires that a business sign is located on property <br />owned by the business. <br />Pedersen pointed out that St. Jude Medical is not a <br />sign-dependent business. Therefore, action on the <br />matter could be delayed until details of the purchase <br />are worked out. <br />Scalze felt that the vacated right-of-way should become <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.