Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 27, 1995 <br />Ayes (5) Morelan, Scalze, Fahey, Pedersen, LaValle. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Council next reviewed the Acquisition Guidelines for <br />the Rice Street/Little Canada Road redevelopment area. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and <br />moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 95-9-217 - APPROVING THE ACQUISITION <br />GUIDELINES AS AMENDED BY THE COUNCIL AT THEIR SEPTEMBER <br />27, 1995 WORKSHOP MEETING <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Pedersen. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Pedersen, Fahey, Morelan, Scalze. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />Morelan asked if the price quoted by the City Planner <br />for development of architectural design quidelines was <br />a not-to-exceed amount. <br />The Planner replied that it was. <br />Fahey noted that development of architectural standards <br />was consistent with Item 11 in the Implementation <br />strategies portion of the Redevelopment Guide. These <br />standards will strengthen the image of the commercial <br />center of the community through some common <br />architectural themes. Fahey stated that he assumed the <br />consultant group supported the development of the <br />architectural design guidelines. <br />Fifield replied that they did. <br />Pedersen asked if it would result in a more consistent <br />product to have the consultant group do the work. <br />The City Planner pointed out that the consultant group <br />used the Comp Plan update work as a baseline, and the <br />same can apply since the Development Guide would serve <br />as a baseline for the architectural design guidelines. <br />Michael Schroeder, Hoisington Koegler Group, reported <br />that they would be available to work with the City <br />Planner, if needed. <br />Fahey asked if the work would be completed by the end <br />of the year. <br />The Planner replied that it would be. <br />2 <br />