My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-11-96 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
09-11-96 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 4:50:01 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:57:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINi7TES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTENIBER 11, 1996 <br />but was a first step in cleaning up an eyesore area. <br />Fahey noted there is a spread of opinion in the <br />neighborhood and felt there needed to be a balance of <br />the reality that the street is for driving and parking <br />vehicles on. Fahey pointed out an overnight parking <br />ban would not seriously impact residents with overnight <br />guests since the City would provide overnight parking <br />permits upon request. However, there are cars being <br />parked on East Rose Place for months at a time without <br />being moved, and the City has no ordinance to prohibit <br />that practice. <br />LaValle did not feel an overnight parking ban would <br />address the public safety issue. <br />Morelan suggested with the overnight parking ban in <br />place, some residents would park in their driveways <br />when coming home after work so they did not have to go <br />back out and move their vehicles later. <br />LaValle indicated he was not sure a 29-foot wide street <br />would be adequate for on-street parking. <br />Morelan pointed out that the City had a 32-foot width <br />minimum in place, however, decreased that minimum for <br />streets which were not heavily traveled. Morelan <br />indicated that not many City streets are designed to <br />accommodate on-street parking, and perhaps only a <br />certain amount of temporary on-street parking. <br />Pedersen asked if anything would be accomplished if one <br />side of the street was posted as no parking. <br />Frison felt that would punish property owners on one <br />side of the street. <br />Morelan felt the best solution would be to post the <br />north side of the street as no parking, and post the <br />south side of the street as no overnight parking. <br />However, in the interim, he was willing to post both <br />sides as no overnight parking and see how that <br />situation works. Morelan indicated he can appreciate <br />the comments of the property owners about the problems <br />this action will create. However, there are many other <br />people with the same situation and they seem to make it <br />work without parking on the street. <br />Fahey indicated he favors moving more narrowly to begin <br />with, therefore, would favor an overnight parking ban. <br />Fahey suggested that be reviewed in a year to see how <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.