My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-98 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
01-14-98 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 5:00:38 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:58:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 14, 1998 <br />has a de~ree in construction management and may be more attuned to the <br />policies and procedures that Little Canada wants. He is also a resident of <br />Little Canada. Bourdon indicated that Bonestroo would like to submit a <br />written proposal as soon as possible. <br />Fahey pointed out that the recommendation ofthe City Administrator is to <br />given Bonestroo 30-days notice of contract termination. Proposals would <br />then be solicited from engineering firms. Fahey asked about the process <br />for reviewing proposals. <br />The City Administrator su~gested that a Request for Proposals as well as a <br />detailed scope of services be prepared similar to what was used in 1990. <br />The Administrator reported that in 199Q City staff reviewed the proposals <br />which were received and selected the top four or five for interviews. <br />Interviews were conducted by the City Council. <br />Scalze felt the process worked well in 1990 and suggested the same <br />process be used. <br />Fahey sug~ested that if the City Administrator's recommendation is <br />adopted, it would be pointless for Bonestroo to reapply. Fahey <br />summarized some of the concerns that the City has had with Bonestroo. <br />Fahey sug~ested that the Council act on the Administrator's <br />recommendation at this time unless members of the Council felt <br />differently. <br />Morelan indicated that he would be willing to entertain a proposal from <br />Bonestroo, but pointed out that ~;iven the concerns, Bonestroo would not <br />be starting at the same point that other en~ineering firms might. <br />Given those comments, Fahey indicated that Bonestroo was welcome to <br />submit a proposal in response to the City's RFP. <br />Mr. Morelan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOI, UTION NO. 98-1-6 - IN.STRUCTING CITY STAFF TO CIVE <br />BONESTROO & ASSOCIATES 30 DAYS NOTICE OF CONTRACT <br />TERMINATIONAND AUTHORIZING COMMENCEMENT OF THE <br />REQUEST FOR PROPOSAI. PROCESS FOR ENGINEERING <br />.4ERVICES AS RECOMMENDED 13Y THE CITYAI)MINISTR.9TOR <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) Morelan, Scalze, Pedersen, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.