My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-13-98 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
05-13-98 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 5:02:22 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:58:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUT~S <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 13, 1998 <br />RESOI, IITION NO. 98-S-I09 - DECLARINC THAT THE CITY OF <br />LITTLE CANADA WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE PROPOSED <br />ALCOHOI_ COMPLIANCE CHECK PROGR,4MAT THIS TIME <br />The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by LaValle. <br />Ayes (2) Fahey, LaValle. <br />Nays (2) Scalze, Pedersen. Resolution failed. <br />McMENEMY The City Administrator reviewed the County's plans for up~rade of <br />& L~BORE McMenemy Road and LaBore Road via cold-in-place recycling. As part <br />ROAD of these projects, the County wou(d install bituminous curb and gutter <br />RECYCLING where possible. The City Administrator recommended that a concrete <br />PROJECT curb and gutter be installed rather than bituminous. The Administrator <br />requested that the Council authorize the City En~ineer to look at the <br />feasibility of concrete curb and gutter as well as whether or not any <br />drainage improvements are necessary alon~ these roads. If the City <br />wishes to pursue an upgraded improvement, the City will have to do a <br />cooperative project with the County. However, the County would be <br />agreeable to such a project. There would be some assessments to residents <br />abutting these roads for the concrete curbing. However, it is anticipated <br />the only the difference in the cost between bituminous and concrete would <br />be assessed subject to County cost participation policies. The <br />Administrator anticipated that the projects would move forward next year <br />since quite a bit of planning would be involved. <br />The Council pointed out other projects which the County has done which <br />included concrete curbing and asked how these improvements were paid <br />for. The Administrator replied that the County has a very consistent <br />policy for their cost participation. Anything beyond that policy would <br />have been paid for by the respective City. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION N0. 98-5-110 -AUTHORIZING THE CITY <br />ENGINEER TO UO FURTHER ANA7 YSIS OF THE LAI30RE ROAD <br />AND McMENEMY ROAD PROJECTS TO DETERMINE THE <br />FEASII37LITY OF CONCRETE CURI3 AND GUTTER AS WELL AS <br />DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS <br />The fore~oing resolution was duly seconded by Sca(ze. <br />Ayes (4) LaValle, Scalze, Fahey, Pedersen. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.