06-24-98 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUT~S CITY COUNCIL JUNF, 24, 1998 1VIr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOI, UTION NO. 98-G-148 -APPROV/NG 7IfE AMENDMENT OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A7.] OWLNG G012DIES' PLACE TO CONDUCT OUTDOQR VOI.I,EYI3AI,7. b'!X NICHT.S PER WEEK UNTII.10 P.M. AS WELL AS THREE TOURNAMENTb' PER YEAR RESERVING TtIE RIGFI'I' TO RE UIEW TFIE CONDITIONAI USE PERMIT SHOUI.D ANY PR013I,EM.S AR/SE A.S A R~SUI.T OF VOI,I,EYI3AI,I, The foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Morelan. Ayes (5) LaValle, Morelan, Pedersen, Sc11ze, Fahey. Nays (0). Resolutiou declared adopted. P'INAL PLAT Council reviewed the tin11 plat for Pitrina Park Terrace Second Addition. FOR PITRTNA It was noted that the Planning Commission has recommended approval of PARK TERRACE the final plat subject to canpliance wiCh the recommendaYions of Yhe City SECOND ADD. Engineer and the Public Worl<s Director. Frank FraYYalone, developer of Pitri~~a P1rlc, asl<ed for clarification of the pedestria~~ path issue, noting that tl~e City En~ineer has pointed out that the City's Code requires 1 15-f'oot wide elsement. Council reviewed the development agreement tltat provides for one pedestrian path, consistin~ of a 12-foot wide easement 1nd 6-foot wide path. The development agreement also called for split rail fencing along the p~th. Tt was noted thlt the Final Plat shows a 10-foot wide }~ath elsement. Morelan asked how the decision was arrived at that the path easement should be 12 feet wide. Fahey su~gested that the dimensions were decided on by City stafP. Scalze suggested that there are other plth easements in the City which are 10 feet in width. Morelan tliought that other path pavement widths have been 8 feet. Fahey suggested that the path easement and ~aving issue be sent back to City staff and the City Engineer for resoiution. Morelan asl<ed if tl~ere was a~ry compelling reason to require the plat to be redrawn increasin~ the 10-foot easeme~~t. The CiYy Administrator sug~ested that a soltiitiou might be for the developer to convey the additional easement via a quit daim deed. The Administrator pointed out that there are issues such as si~ow storage to consider.