Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />DECEMBER 17, 1998 <br />Kimmes indicated in response to the comments of the City Engineer in his <br />report dated December 1 l, 1998, that details of final elevations and <br />drainage would be worked out prior to submission of the Final plat to the <br />City for approval. <br />Scalze noted that there are issues of gradin~ and drainage of the Gilanderi <br />plat as it abuts the property to the west as well as issues on the east portion <br />of the plat. Scalze stated that she did not feel comfortable actin~ on the <br />preliminary plat until these issues are worked out with the adjoining <br />property owners. <br />Kimmes replied that he has not had an opportunity to discuss drainage <br />issues with Brian Ducharme, who owns the property to the west. <br />However, in developing the drainage plan for the Gilanderi Plat, Kimmes <br />felt that the approach taken was based upon common sense. Kimmes <br />stated that if Mr. Ducharme is reluctant to agree to the draina~e as <br />proposed, a retaining wall can be built which will contain run-off on the <br />Gilanderi property. <br />The City Engineer agreed that the retaining wall was an option to keeping <br />~;rading on the Kimmes property. However, the Engineer felt it would be <br />better to have the grading extend onto the property to the west rather than <br />keep the existing depression. <br />Fahey noted that the Council wouid require that these grading issues be <br />resolved before action is taken on the final plat. <br />Scalze asked if there would be any filling done prior to final plat approval. <br />Kimmes replied that he knows he has to resolve several issues before the <br />Council will act on the final plat. Kimmes indicated that this evening he is <br />looking for approval of the four-lot concept. <br />Scalze noted that the City Engineer and City Planner have recommended <br />extension of the 24-foot wide road to serve the four-lot development. <br />Scalze commented that a three-lot development would not require <br />widening of the road. <br />Kimmes agreed to the extension of the 24-foot road width, and noted that <br />the road is shown entirely on his property. There would be some existing <br />blacktop removed from the property to the east. <br />Fahey asked if there was anyone from the general pubiic present wishing <br />to comment on this matter. <br />2 <br />