My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-99 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
01-14-99 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 5:06:51 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:58:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 14, 1999 <br />At this point in the meeting, 8:50 P.M., power was re-established. The <br />Counci( resumed the Council meeting, but was not able to resume the <br />video-tapin~ of the meeting. <br />DELONAI5 Kathy Delonais-Adams expressed her disappointment that she had to <br />OPTION read an article in the newspaper about the City's exercising of the <br />AGREEMENT option agreement on her father's property rather than being informed by <br />the City. Delonais-Adams was concerned that the Council had been <br />discussion this matter for two months without including her in that <br />discussion. <br />The City Administrator and the City Council assured Delonais-Adams that <br />this is the first time this matter has been discussed by the Council. The <br />Administrator noted that he copied Delonais-Adams with his letter to the <br />Council on this subject. <br />Delonais-Adams asked the next step. The Administrator replied that he <br />would wark out the details with Delonais-Adams, and pointed out that <br />there would be latitude in when the property would need to be vacated, <br />since the City has no immediate plans for it. <br />COUNTY The City Administrator reported that a nei~hborhood meeting was held <br />ROAD B-2/ on the County Road B-2 project. At that meeting, the Watershed reported <br />GERVAIS that they have determined that there is a 9-acre area draining into the <br />BEACH County Road B-2 storm sewer system, there for additional lines and catch <br />PROJECT basins are required. The Watershed will be paying approximately $57,000 <br /> ofthe storm drainage costs, the County $18,000, and the City $38,000. <br /> The County will be incurring road improvement costs as well. The <br /> Administrator reported that an easement is necessary for the drainage <br /> improvement, and the property owner has agreed to work with the City in <br /> granting this easement. <br />Morelan asked where the City's share of improvement costs would come <br />from. The Administrator anticipated that costs would come from the <br />Infrastructure Replacement Fund. <br />Mr. Morelan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOI.UTIONNO. 99-I-10 - AUTHORIZING THE CITY'S <br />PARTICIPATION IN THE COUNTY ROAD B-2 AND I.AKE <br />GERVAIS 73EACH PROJECT AS OUTI.INED I3Y WATERSHED <br />DI,STRICT AT AN ESTIMATED COT OF $39, 950 <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.