Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 25, 1999 <br />The foregoin~ resolution was duly seconded by Scalze. <br />Ayes (4) LaValle, Scalze, Pedersen, Fahey. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />CONCEPT Mr. Marlc Oberman, Swift Construction, appeared before the Council <br />REVIEW - with a concept development plan for the property located at 3240 Twin <br />3240 TWIN Lake Road. Oberman indicated that his original plan proposed a five <br />LAKE ROAD lot development. However, due to the size of the cul-de-sac needed in <br /> improvin~ Mitchell Trail, there was insu~cient area left to meet minimum <br /> lot sizes. Therefore, Oberman submitted a revised concept plan with three <br /> lots. These lots would have street access via Twin Lake Road and the <br /> improvement of Mitchell Trail would not be necessary to serve these new <br /> lots. <br />Scalze pointed out that there are homes adjacent to this propeity being <br />served via a driveway over Mitchell TraiL Scalze indicated that when the <br />easement was dedicated it was with the thought that one day the street <br />would be improved and these lots would then abut a City street. <br />Oberman pointed out that if his property is not developed, the houses to <br />the north would remain serviced by a driveway. If the Council allowed <br />the revised proposal for three lots serviced from Twin Lake Road, the <br />houses to the north would again remain serviced by a driveway. <br />Fahey suggested that if the City reduced the cul-de-sac size, it may be <br />possible to get four to five lots as wel] as the improvement of Mitchell <br />Trail. <br />Oberman requested that if there is an road right-of-way that is not <br />necessary, this be vacated in order to give him additional square footage to <br />work with in developing a plan for the property. <br />Fahey suggested that Oberman work with the City Planner on concept <br />drawings for the property, which include the undersized cul-de-sac. <br />Scalze agreed, and stated that she did not think the City should have <br />houses that are not located on a public street. Therefore, she felt it <br />important that Mitchell Trai] be developed. Scalze felt it made more sense <br />to ~rant a variance for cul-de-sac size. <br />Mr. LaValle introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RE.SOI. UTION NO. 99-5-T 21- TAI37,ING CONSIDERATION OF <br />THE 3240 TWIN I,AKE ROAD DEVEI.OPMENT CONCEPT UNTII. <br />THE JUNE 22, I999 COUNCII. MEETIN(i PENDINC SUI3MISSION <br />