Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 8, 1999 <br />The Administrator pointed out that the City has previously reviewed five <br />or six assessment alternatives for the Minnesota Street project. Staff <br />recommendation was to assess Cobblestone Villa~e on a fi~ont footage <br />basis that resulted in an estimate of approximately $12,000. <br />Pedersen suggested that a$12,000 assessment may be acceptable to the <br />Cobblestone Villa~e property owners and he questioned spendin~ $4,000 <br />to justify that assessment. Fahey, LaValle, and Scalze agreed. <br />Morelan pointed out that the City could solicit RFP's to other appraisers in <br />an attempt to obtain a lower appraisal cost. Morelan felt the appraisal <br />information will provide the City with a more definitive answer on <br />assessments. <br />Scalze felt the information would only be worthwhile if the City were <br />contemplating changin~ its assessment policy. <br />The Administrator pointed out that the way Cobblestone Village abuts <br />Minnesota Avenue is an aberration. Therefore, the results of a before and <br />after appraisal of this particular assessment may not be easily applied to <br />other assessments. A more standard situation would result in the type of <br />information that Morelan is looking for. <br />Morelan pointed out that at the assessment policy workshop the issue of <br />the before and after appraisal came up and the property owners were <br />informed that this would be done. <br />Pedersen su~~ested that if the assessment were $50,000, a$4,000 <br />appraisal cost may be justified. But not for a$12,000 assessment <br />estimate. <br />Morelan pointed out that perhaps the before and after appraisal would <br />justify a$30,000 assessment. The Administrator pointed out that one <br />appraiser indicated that a$12,000 assessment appeared to be realistic. <br />The Administrator also pointed out that if a$30,000 assessment were <br />justified against Cobblestone Village, it would result in a change in the <br />distribution of assessment dollars against benefiting properties. It does not <br />impact the City's share of costs. <br />Scalze asked if the $4,000 appraisal cost could be assessed back to project <br />costs. The Administrator was not sure that would be justifiable. <br />