My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-99 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
06-22-99 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2009 5:09:52 PM
Creation date
7/31/2009 2:58:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JUNE 22, 1999 <br />that the City can consider neighborhood factors as well as the Comp Plan <br />in making its decision. <br />There was no one from the general public present wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by Morelan, seconded by Scalze, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Buetow noted that at the Planning Commission some of the adjacent <br />property owners raised concerns about property values. Buetow indicated <br />that he would like to put up a new building, which will be aesthetically <br />pleasin~;. The new building would be tied into the existing house. The <br />entire structure would have a stucco exterior. The outdoor storage would <br />then be brought inside. <br />Morelan pointed out that the Comp Plan designated the future use ofthis <br />prope~ty as residential. Even though the addition described to the house <br />sounds like it would be an improvement to the property, Morelan pointed <br />out that it does not reflect the City's Land Use Plan. Morelan sug~ested <br />that the City may need to rezone the property. He indicated that it doesn't <br />make sense for the City to allow improvements to this property. Morelan <br />suggested that perhaps the City can assist in relocating this business to <br />another area of the City. <br />Buetow pointed out the Arcade Electric use that is adjacent to his <br />prope~ty. <br />LaValle staYed that until Arcade Electric and its metal buildings are gone, <br />the Buetow propeity is not a good residential property. <br />Fahey suggested that the City should not expand the I-1 use of this <br />property, and suggested that perhaps the City should allow the use to <br />continue as it is with no up~rades to the property. <br />Buetow asked if the City would consider allowing the outdoor storage for <br />a couple of years until he was able to find another location. <br />Fahey agreed that perhaps the City should try to relocate this business to a <br />more appropriate use. Buetow was concerned about getting another <br />location at a comparable cost. <br />Fahey pointed out that the CUP is being the Council this evening and <br />noted the Planning Commission's recommendation for denial. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.