My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-09 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
08-26-09 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2009 2:02:29 PM
Creation date
8/21/2009 1:58:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> those that need something less than full plat review. Under the current language, the <br /> <br /> following subdivisions are exempt from full platting: <br /> These Subdivisions are allowed by "metes and bounds", or certificates of survey. They <br /> require Planning Commission review and City Council approval, but do not require the <br /> full documentation of a Preliminary Plat: <br /> • Subdivisions that only adjust the location of a common boundary lot line between <br /> adjoining properties. <br /> • Subdivisions that create two lots out of one, provided there are no non- <br /> conformities on the property. <br /> In addition, in the case of a request for a lot combination, the City Administrator may <br /> approve this "subdivision" without review or approval of the Planning Commission and <br /> Council. <br /> Staff recalls that at some point in the past, the City permitted subdivisions of as many as <br /> three new lots to proceed as "simple subdivisions", but this does not appear to be the <br /> case under the current language. As a part of this review, the Council may wish to <br /> discuss this threshold to either confirm the current two-lot language, or consider a <br /> different allowance. <br /> The Planning Commission did not discuss this aspect of the proposed amendment. The <br /> Council should consider whether further Planning Commission input would be <br /> appropriate if a different lot count is to be included in this amendment. <br /> 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.