Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MINUTES <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> SEPTEMBER 23, 2009 <br /> suggestions by State officials that the use of administrative fines was not <br /> authorized under State Law. During the past legislative session law was <br /> passed authorizing the use of administrative fines on a limited basis for <br /> such violations as minor speeding (less than 10 miles per hour over limit), <br /> stop line violations and loud equipment issues. The law authorizes fines <br /> of $60 with $40 to go to the local government and $20 to the State. If <br /> citations are issued by the State Patrol, then the distribution is $40 to the <br /> State and $20 to the local government. <br /> The Administrator reported that the group of cities contracting with the <br /> Ramsey County Sheriff s Department for police services would like to <br /> pursue administrative fines on a uniform basis among the cities. The <br /> consensus of the contracting group would be that the Sheriff s Department <br /> collects the fines and uses the revenue as a credit back against the budget. <br /> The goal would be to have this system in place by January 1, 2010. <br /> The City Administrator noted that the City Attorney has put together the <br /> documents necessary to enact the administrative fine process. The goal <br /> this evening is to discuss the Council's position on this issue. The <br /> Administrator noted that there is also the opportunity to expand the <br /> administrative fine program beyond just traffic violations and include code <br /> enforcement violations. <br /> Blesener noted the hearing officer process for people to appeal an <br /> administrative fine and noted the cost associated with that process. The <br /> Administrator indicated that cities that have been using the administrative <br /> fine process have not had a lot of contested cases. He noted that the goal <br /> of the contracting cities would be to share a hearing officer and set up an <br /> efficient process for processing appeals, thus keeping the cost at a <br /> minimum. <br /> Keis noted the ability to address local ordinance violation issues with <br /> administrative fines, and asked if the contracting group is anticipating a <br /> uniform approach for these types of violations. The Administrator <br /> indicated that this issue was not discussed by the contracting group, and <br /> indicated that he would raise it at the next meeting. <br /> Keis asked the amount of revenue that might be expected from these fines. <br /> The Administrator reported that Mounds View was collecting <br /> approximately $50,000 per year, but his estimate for Little Canada would <br /> be closer to $10,000. <br /> Keis asked if administrative fines would be helpful in addressing code <br /> enforcement issues. The Administrator reported that the City Attorney <br /> feels the fines would be helpful to a certain degree. It was also noted that <br /> if an administrative tine is not paid, the City can issue a criminal citation. <br /> 4 <br /> <br />