10-28-09 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 28, 2009 1'he Administrator then reviewed a list of meetings with the property owners, letters sent to the property owners, and citations issued to the property owners. The Administrator noted that the property owner has been cited recently on three occasions for code violations -May, 2007, August, 2008, and September, 2008. He pointed out that the property owners made application on May 18, 2009 for an amendment to thou PUD Permit which was the court date for the citations. The Administrator felt that the application was made to show the courC that the properly owners were trying to resolve their violations. The Administrator then reviewed the processing of the 2009 PiJD Amendment application, noting that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the revised PUD (subject to the new ordinance requirements) on July 9, 2009, and further recommended if the property owner decided not to go forward with the revisions, compliance with Che existing PUD should be achieved by November 30, 2009. The PUD application was then reviewed by the City Council on July 22, 2009. 'fhe Council denied the application for a revised PUD Permit. The property owners did not appear at the .Tuly 22"d meeting, thus the Council gave them until the nexC regular Council meeting (August 12, 2009) to appeal Their decision. That was communicated to the property owner in writing and by a telephone call. The Administrator noted that the staff report submitted to the Council in July recommends that should the Council deny the amended PUD request, the property owner have 90 days to bring the property into compliance. The 90 days expired on October 22, 2009. The property owner had been provided with a copy of dre staff's report which was dated in June of 2009; so essentially, the property owner was given 120 days notice of this recommendation given the tabling of action on Chis matter. The Administrator also reportod that staff sent a letter to the property owner on October 5, 2009 reminding them of the October 22"d compliance deadline. "the City Administrator reported that Vision Tree called and informed City staff that the property owner gave them 60 days notice to vacate the property. Vision Tree confirmed that the property owner had the notices That were just mentioned, as the property owner informed Vision Tree of the City's actions. The City Administrator indicated that based on this information, City staff is recommending that the PUD Permit for 3151 Country Drive be revoked based on the following findings of fact: There has been failure to comply with the requirements of the Planned Unit Development Permit approvals by the designated deadline of October 20, 2009. 8