Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MINUTES <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> NOVEMBER 9, 2009 <br /> The Planner also reported that Hom is requesting considerable directional <br /> signage, as well as that the directional signage include advertising <br /> messages. The Planner reported that the advertising messages would put <br /> these signs in the category of business signs, and he recommended that no <br /> advertising messages be allowed. <br /> With regard to temporary signage, the Planner noted that the 2007 PUD <br /> Permit approval indicated that temporary signage must comply with all <br /> code requirements. 'T'hese requirements limit temporary signage to four <br /> permits per year for a maximum of 120 days in a calendar year (essentially <br /> four 30-day permits). There is also a 36 square foot size maximum on <br /> temporary signage. The Planner reported that Hom is requesting that <br /> while temporary signage be limited to 120 days in a calendar year, that <br /> any number of permits can be issued eliminating the four permit <br /> maximum. Hom would be proposing several three-day permits maxing <br /> out at the 120 day total. Hom is also requesting a much larger temporary <br /> sign size, requesting up to 200 square feet in size. It is Hom's position <br /> that a 36 square foot sign would not be visible given the massive building <br /> elevations. <br /> The Planner noted that the Code allows the use of searchlights providing <br /> for up to four permits in a calendar year, five days in length, for a total <br /> maximum number of 20 days. I-Iom is requesting that the 20 days allowed <br /> for searchlights not be limited by four permits, allowing them to allocate <br /> the 20 days in airy number of segments. <br /> The Planner reported that signage is restricted to a maximum of 15% of <br /> the building silhouette, and all signage (both wall and pylon) are under the <br /> 15% maximum. <br /> Ralph Kloiber, Real Estate Director for Hom, reported on the history of <br /> the previous PUD Permit and the fact that economic conditions derailed <br /> that concept. Kloiber reported that Hom feels the economy is improving <br /> and would like to put the property to use. I Ie indicated that Hom has <br /> researched alternative concepts to their current business model, and noted <br /> the success that the concept proposed as Dock 86 is having in other areas <br /> of the country. Kloiber reported that Dock 86 is not a clearance center <br /> noting that 90% of the merchandise will be new and in the box. In <br /> addition to Dock 86, Hom will be seeking tenants for up to four space <br /> locations in the north building. These tenants will follow the listing of <br /> uses previously approved in the 2007 PUD Permit and will be <br /> complimentary to the Dock 86 business. <br /> With regard to parking, Kloiber reported that they have extensive parking <br /> studies at all their locations, and their busiest location in Plymouth has less <br /> 3 <br /> <br />