My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-09 Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
11-09-09 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2009 9:37:06 AM
Creation date
11/17/2009 9:36:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> MINUT)JS <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> NOV>?MBI;R 9, 2009 <br /> noted that both wall and pylon signage do not exceed the 15% of the <br /> building silhouette area. <br /> With regard to recommendation #1 I, Kloiber reported that Hom had no <br /> plans to change the footprint of the building. However, should the <br /> building convert to a Hom store, they may add a second floor as was <br /> proposed in 2007. Plans would be submitted at that time. <br /> Recommendation #12 would be complied with. <br /> Fischer stated that his concern was that with the tent sales acid temporary <br /> outdoor sales, Hom is proposing a total of 150 days of temporary signage. <br /> Fischer questioned the use of the term "temporary" for this signage, when <br /> it will be up virtually all times that the Dock 86 retail operation is open. <br /> Fischer also asked if the 200 square feet of temporary signage fell under <br /> the I S% building silhouette maximum. The Planner replied that it did. It <br /> was again noted that this temporary banner would be placed on the north <br /> side of the building until tenants were found for that space. 'Then the <br /> temporary banner would be moved to the east side of the building. <br /> Duray suggested a compromise ou the amount of temporary signage at <br /> 100 square feet. Johansen stated that a 100 square foot sign would still be <br /> difficult to read from the freeway given the size of the building. <br /> Barraclough stated that he had no problem with the 200 square foot sign <br /> given the intent that it be readable from the freeway. He noted that the <br /> PUD allows the City flexibility, but again his only concern was that of <br /> precedent. Barraclough agreed that findings should be a part of the <br /> temporary signage approval. <br /> Pechmann asked if the temporary signage would be up every weekend that <br /> Dock 86 is open. Johansen stated that the intent was not to have the <br /> temporary sign up every weekend, and suggested a compromise of five <br /> months of weekends. Kloiber also noted that Hom has agreed with City <br /> staff to notify them whenever the sign is in use so that its usage can be <br /> tracked. <br /> In discussing the compromise on temporary signage, the Planning <br /> Commission agreed that it would allow temporary signage of 200 square <br /> feet to be up a total of 65 days as regulated by 20 individual permits. <br /> Given Dock 86 will be open three days over a weekend, plus allowing for <br /> some four day weekends (President's Day, Memorial Day, etc.), the 65 <br /> days will be allocated over 20 separate permits. The Commission felt that <br /> the 200 square feet was appropriate given the site of the building and the <br /> visibility to the fi•eeway. Fischer noted the public safety aspect of having <br /> a readable sign for freeway drivers. It was also noted that the 200 square <br /> 7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.