My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-10 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
01-14-10 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/19/2010 1:43:58 PM
Creation date
1/19/2010 1:38:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br /> JANUARY 14, 2010 <br /> DYNAMIC Duray noted the discussion at the Council level relative to dynamic and <br /> SIGN electronic sign regulations and the need for revisions. Duray pointed out <br /> REGULATIONS that when the regulations were first enacted, this was a fairly new area of <br /> signage regulations. Since that time dynamic signs have become more <br /> popular with Duray noting this signage at CVS Pharmaoy and Culver's. <br /> Given the way these two new developments utilize their dynamic signs, it <br /> is the Council's feeling that adjustment are needed relative to the <br /> regulation of letter size and timing. <br /> The City Planner agreed that when the City adopted its dynamic and <br /> electronic sign regulations, this was a new area of regulation. After a <br /> great deal of discussion, the Council adopted regulations of a middle range <br /> to what other cities had adopted. Letter size was regulated at no smaller <br /> than 10 inches in heights and sign messages could change no quicker than <br /> every 10 minutes. The expectation was that these regulations would avoid <br /> public safety concerns related to the distraction that these signs may cause. <br /> The Planner indicated that there are two categories of dynamic signs, the <br /> commercial signage similar to what Culvers and C,VS and the large digital <br /> billboard displays. At the time the City's ordinance was adopted, the <br /> regulations applied to both types of dynamic signs. It is the Council's <br /> feeling at this time, that the regulations should vary between these two <br /> categories of sign. "therefore, the proposal is to allow letter height of no <br /> smaller than 6 inches and sign message changes no more frequently then <br /> every 10 seconds for dynamic signs along standard roadways. The large <br /> digital billboard displays along freeways would still be subject to the <br /> minimum letter size of 10 inches and message changes no more frequently <br /> than every ] 0 minutes. <br /> Everson asked if any of the existing businesses would not be able to meet <br /> these new standards. The City Planner indicated that there should be no <br /> trouble in meeting them. <br /> Duray read an email from Chair Dan Knudsen indicating his support for <br /> the proposed changes. Duray also indicated that he, too, supports the <br /> changes proposed. I3e feh these new regulations allowed businesses to <br /> better compete in the market place. Ile also noted that there has been no <br /> evidence that the dynamic signs, regulated as proposed, would create a <br /> traffic safety hazard. <br /> Pechmaxm stated that he supports the proposed changes. He suggested a <br /> message change quicker than every 10 minutes for billboards would not be <br /> a problem. The City Planner noted that there are three existing billboards <br /> in Little Canada. These are non-conforming uses under the City's Code as <br /> billboards are no longer allowed. The Planner indicated that, as a result, <br /> there would be a reluctance to be too expansive with the regulations of <br /> -9- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.