My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-08-10 Planning Comm. Minutes
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
04-08-10 Planning Comm. Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2010 3:01:10 PM
Creation date
4/13/2010 3:00:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> MINUTIJS <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> APRIL 8, 2010 <br /> Knudsen indicated that the City's interest is in cleaning up outdoor <br /> storage, but is also interested in working with existing businesses. <br /> Knudsen asked if the plan was to have a new building constructed by the <br /> end of 2011. He felt any approval for temporary outdoor storage should <br /> have an end date of 2011. <br /> Anderson suggested that either the building be constructed by 2011 and <br /> the outdoor storage moved inside, or the property would have to be <br /> compliant by the end of 2011. Anderson felt that the property was not that <br /> far from compliance. Anderson stated that it is his goal to be compliant or <br /> have a building up and operational within 3 years. <br /> Knudsen stated that he is inclined to work with Poolside, but also would <br /> like to push the business towards compliance as quickly as possible. <br /> Anderson stated that his goal is to operate a compliant business, but <br /> indicated that his hesitation in committing to a timeline for a new building <br /> is based on the economy acrd his ability to present two years of profitable <br /> business numbers to the bank. Anderson suggested that a profitable 2010 <br /> would allow him to construct a new building in 2011. <br /> Knudsen noted that Poolside currently has a CUP Permit for their outdoor <br /> display area. The City Plarmer indicated that the request for PUD Permit <br /> for outdoor display would reconfirm the existing CUP Permit. The <br /> Planner noted that the outdoor display is for swimming pools, spas, <br /> gazebos, and related patio equipment as was previously approved under a <br /> CUP Permit. <br /> Knudsen noted that the part of the reason for the PUD process proposed <br /> for Poolside to treat this business fairly and consistently under the Code. <br /> The City has pushed a lot of businesses to become compliant relative to <br /> outdoor storage. Duray noted that there has been movement on the <br /> Commission and the City Council to work with longstanding businesses to <br /> help them get compliance. Duray noted that the City has done this with <br /> the understanding that the economy has been on a downturn and has given <br /> businesses time to get back on their feet. <br /> Duray asked Anderson's plan for surfacing the storage area. Anderson <br /> replied that the surface is compacted Class V and it was his intention to <br /> leave it as such. Anderson stated that it would be a financial hardship to <br /> have to blacktop this area when it would be used for storage for any a <br /> short period of time. Anderson noted that the area is screened and is not <br /> visible. He also noted that there are no dust issues from this area. Duray <br /> asked if the area would be returned to a green area once the new building <br /> is constructed. Anderson replied that it would. <br /> -6- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.