Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MINUTES <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> SEPTEMBER 9, 2010 <br /> that his outdoor storage use of the property should be grandfathered given <br /> it existed at the time of the rezoning. <br /> The City Planner reviewed the history of the City's rezoning of the area, <br /> noting that properties abutting South Owasso Blvd. were rezoned to I-P, <br /> properties considered to be part of Ryan Industrial Park retained their I-1 <br /> zoning, and a portion of the former Frattalone property abutting South <br /> Owasso Blvd. was also rezoned to I-P while a portion of this same site <br /> remained I-1. <br /> The Planner noted that a couple of years ago the City changed the <br /> standards for outdoor storage in the I-P District and reduced the amount of <br /> outdoor storage allowed. The Planner indicated that the outdoor storage <br /> on this parcel is in compliance with I-I District standards, but not I-P <br /> District standards. He further noted that the building on the site is of <br /> metal construction which complies with the I-1 District while the I-P <br /> District required masonry construction. The Planner noted that there are a <br /> lot ofnon-conformities on this site to I-P standards. A rezoning of the <br /> property to I-1 would eliminate most of these non-conformities. "the <br /> Planner further pointed out that the property abuts I-1 zoning on three <br /> sites. <br /> Knudsen. asked if approval of the request would cause the City any issues <br /> with precedent. The Planner indicated that zoning is a discretionary act <br /> and he foresaw no precedent concerns. <br /> The City Planner noted that the issues raised in his report relate the <br /> outdoor storage to the current I-P zoning of the property. If rezoned to I-1, <br /> the property will comply with nearly all of the outdoor storage conditions <br /> for that zoning district. The primary violation is the existence of an old <br /> office trailer at the back of the property. The Planner indicated that this is <br /> not an eligible storage item. <br /> Duray asked if Mr. Nielsen would be willing to remove the trailer. <br /> Nielsen indicated that he uses it for storage, but would remove it if he was <br /> required to. Duray also noted the Planner's recommendation for a new <br /> site plan. so that staff can verify compliance with the conditions listed in <br /> his report. The City Planner informed Mr. Nielsen that he or the Code <br /> Enforcement Officer could assist him with preparation of that site plan. It <br /> should be submitted prior to the City Council meeting on September 20, <br /> 2010. <br /> Nielsen asked if he would be required to screen the entire outdoor storage <br /> area. The Planner noted that only the view from the street would be <br /> required to be screened. <br /> -3- <br /> <br />